Note: When clicking on a Digital Object Identifier (DOI) number, you will be taken to an external site maintained by the publisher.
                                            Some full text articles may not yet be available without a charge during the embargo (administrative interval).
                                        
                                        
                                        
                                            
                                                
                                             What is a DOI Number?
                                        
                                    
                                
Some links on this page may take you to non-federal websites. Their policies may differ from this site.
- 
            Free, publicly-accessible full text available December 19, 2025
- 
            Electrotactile stimulus is a form of sensory substitution in which an electrical signal is perceived as a mechanical sensation. The electrotactile effect could, in principle, recapitulate a range of tactile experience by selective activation of nerve endings. However, the method has been plagued by inconsistency, galvanic reactions, pain and desensitization, and unwanted stimulation of nontactile nerves. Here, we describe how a soft conductive block copolymer, a stretchable layout, and concentric electrodes, along with psychophysical thresholding, can circumvent these shortcomings. These purpose-designed materials, device layouts, and calibration techniques make it possible to generate accurate and reproducible sensations across a cohort of 10 human participants and to do so at ultralow currents (≥6 microamperes) without pain or desensitization. This material, form factor, and psychophysical approach could be useful for haptic devices and as a tool for activation of the peripheral nervous system.more » « less
- 
            BackgroundFrequent sensor-assisted monitoring of changes in swallowing function may help improve detection of radiation-associated dysphagia before it becomes permanent. While our group has prototyped an epidermal strain/surface electromyography sensor that can detect minute changes in swallowing muscle movement, it is unknown whether patients with head and neck cancer would be willing to wear such a device at home after radiation for several months. ObjectiveWe iteratively assessed patients’ design preferences and perceived barriers to long-term use of the prototype sensor. MethodsIn study 1 (questionnaire only), survivors of pharyngeal cancer who were 3-5 years post treatment and part of a larger prospective study were asked their design preferences for a hypothetical throat sensor and rated their willingness to use the sensor at home during the first year after radiation. In studies 2 and 3 (iterative user testing), patients with and survivors of head and neck cancer attending visits at MD Anderson’s Head and Neck Cancer Center were recruited for two rounds of on-throat testing with prototype sensors while completing a series of swallowing tasks. Afterward, participants were asked about their willingness to use the sensor during the first year post radiation. In study 2, patients also rated the sensor’s ease of use and comfort, whereas in study 3, preferences were elicited regarding haptic feedback. ResultsThe majority of respondents in study 1 (116/138, 84%) were willing to wear the sensor 9 months after radiation, and participant willingness rates were similar in studies 2 (10/14, 71.4%) and 3 (12/14, 85.7%). The most prevalent reasons for participants’ unwillingness to wear the sensor were 9 months being excessive, unwanted increase in responsibility, and feeling self-conscious. Across all three studies, the sensor’s ability to detect developing dysphagia increased willingness the most compared to its appearance and ability to increase adherence to preventive speech pathology exercises. Direct haptic signaling was also rated highly, especially to indicate correct sensor placement and swallowing exercise performance. ConclusionsPatients and survivors were receptive to the idea of wearing a personalized risk sensor for an extended period during the first year after radiation, although this may have been limited to well-educated non-Hispanic participants. A significant minority of patients expressed concern with various aspects of the sensor’s burden and its appearance. Trial RegistrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT03010150; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03010150more » « less
- 
            Abstract Epidermal sensors for remote healthcare and performance monitoring require the ability to operate under the effects of bodily motion, heat, and perspiration. Here, the use of purpose‐synthesized polymer‐based dry electrodes and graphene‐based strain gauges to obtain measurements of swallowed volume under typical conditions of exercise is evaluated. The electrodes, composed of the common conductive polymer poly(3,4 ethylenedioxythiophene) (PEDOT) electrostatically bound to poly(styrenesulfonate)‐b‐poly(poly(ethylene glycol) methyl ether acrylate) (PSS‐b‐PPEGMEA), collect surface electromyography (sEMG) signals on the submental muscle group, under the chin. Simultaneously, the deformation of the surface of the skin is measured using strain gauges comprising single‐layer graphene supporting subcontinuous coverage of gold and a highly plasticized composite containing PEDOT:PSS. Together, these materials permit high stretchability, high resolution, and resistance to sweat. A custom printed circuit board (PCB) allows this multicomponent system to acquire strain and sEMG data wirelessly. This sensor platform is tested on the swallowing activity of a cohort of 10 subjects while walking or cycling on a stationary bike. Using a machine learning (ML) model, it is possible to predict swallowed volume with absolute errors of 36% for walking and 43% for cycling.more » « less
 An official website of the United States government
An official website of the United States government 
				
			 
					 
					
